Procurement observatory.

<!-- PAGE 1 --># WRITTEN REPORT OF THE CONTRACTING AUTHORITY

**drawn up in connection with the Public procurement entitled**

# „UPOL/FoS/DEP - Cryostat systems for Mössbauer spectroscopy"

**Identification of the Public procurement**

Type of Public procurement: Supplies Award procedure: Abovethreshold regime Public procurement procedure: Open procedure Registration Number in the Z2026-044972 Czech Public Procurement Bulletin (VVZ): Contract Notice Number in the 571819-2026 Official Journal of the European Union: Link to the Public procurement: https://zakazky.upol.cz/vz00005893 (hereinafter referred to in this document as the **"Public Procurement"** )

**Identification of the Contracting authority**

Name: Palacký University Olomouc Registered Office: Křížkovského 511/8, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic Company ID No.: 619 89 592 Statutory body: doc. JUDr. Michael Kohajda, Ph.D., rector (hereinafter referred to in this document as the **"Contracting authority"** ) The Contracting authority has prepared this written report on the procurement procedure for the Public procurement in accordance with Section 217 of Act No. 134/2016 Coll., on Public Procurement, as amended (hereinafter referred to as the "ZZVZ").

1. **Subject of the Public procurement**

The subject of the Public procurement is delivery of two cryostat systems for Mössbauer spectroscopy with different design concepts, with a shared cooling system utilizing an external/outdoor heat exchanger. The scope includes complete system integration, installation, commissioning, and user training.

<!-- PAGE 2 -->1. **Identification of the Participants in the Procurement Procedure and Their Tender Price**
2. Name: OptiXs, s.r.o. Registered Office: Křivoklátská 37/3, Letňany, 199 00 Praha 9, Czech Republic Company ID No. (IČO): 02016770 Tender Price: CZK 7,688,300.00 excluding VAT
3. **Identification of Excluded Participants in the Procurement Procedure, Including the Reasons for Their Exclusion**

The Contracting authority did not exclude any participant from the procurement procedure for the Public procurement.

1. **Identification of the Supplier with Whom the Contract Was Concluded, Including the Reasons for Its Selection and the Contract Price**

The Contracting authority did not conclude a contract with any supplier.

1. **Justification for the Use of a Negotiated Procedure with Prior Publication or a Competitive Dialogue**

The Contracting authority did not use a negotiated procedure without prior publication

1. **Justification for the Use of a Negotiated Procedure without Prior Publication**

The Contracting authority did not use a negotiated procedure without prior publication.

1. **Justification for the Use of the Simplified Regime**

The Contracting authority did not use the simplified regime.

1. **Justification for the Cancellation of the Procurement Procedure**

The procurement procedure for the Public procurement was cancelled pursuant to Section 127(2)(h) of the ZZVZ, as there was only one participant in the procurement procedure.

1. **Justification for the Use of Means of Communication Other than Electronic Means for the Submission of Tenders**

The Contracting authority permitted the submission of tenders exclusively by electronic means.

1. **List of Persons in Respect of Whom a Conflict of Interest Was Identified and the Measures Subsequently Adopted**

The Contracting authority did not identify any persons with a conflict of interest.

1. **Justification for Not Dividing the Above-Threshold Public procurement into Lots**

The Public procurement was not divided into lots because its subject matter constitutes a single integrated system/unit that cannot be technically divided without limiting certain functionalities of the

<!-- PAGE 3 -->equipment. Owing to the nature of the subject matter of the performance, the Public procurement could therefore not be divided into lots.

1. **Justification for Requiring Proof of Turnover in Accordance with Section 78(3) of the ZZVZ**

The Contracting authority did not require proof of turnover in accordance with Section 78(3) of the ZZVZ. In Olomouc

…………………………………………… doc. JUDr. Michael Kohajda, Ph.D. rector

Page 1

# WRITTEN REPORT OF THE CONTRACTING AUTHORITY

**drawn up in connection with the Public procurement entitled**

# „UPOL/FoS/DEP - Cryostat systems for Mössbauer spectroscopy"

**Identification of the Public procurement**

Type of Public procurement: Supplies Award procedure: Abovethreshold regime Public procurement procedure: Open procedure Registration Number in the Z2026-044972 Czech Public Procurement Bulletin (VVZ): Contract Notice Number in the 571819-2026 Official Journal of the European Union: Link to the Public procurement: https://zakazky.upol.cz/vz00005893 (hereinafter referred to in this document as the **"Public Procurement"** )

**Identification of the Contracting authority**

Name: Palacký University Olomouc Registered Office: Křížkovského 511/8, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic Company ID No.: 619 89 592 Statutory body: doc. JUDr. Michael Kohajda, Ph.D., rector (hereinafter referred to in this document as the **"Contracting authority"** ) The Contracting authority has prepared this written report on the procurement procedure for the Public procurement in accordance with Section 217 of Act No. 134/2016 Coll., on Public Procurement, as amended (hereinafter referred to as the "ZZVZ").

1. **Subject of the Public procurement**

The subject of the Public procurement is delivery of two cryostat systems for Mössbauer spectroscopy with different design concepts, with a shared cooling system utilizing an external/outdoor heat exchanger. The scope includes complete system integration, installation, commissioning, and user training.

Page 2

1. **Identification of the Participants in the Procurement Procedure and Their Tender Price**

1. Name: OptiXs, s.r.o. Registered Office: Křivoklátská 37/3, Letňany, 199 00 Praha 9, Czech Republic Company ID No. (IČO): 02016770 Tender Price: CZK 7,688,300.00 excluding VAT

1. **Identification of Excluded Participants in the Procurement Procedure, Including the Reasons for Their Exclusion**

The Contracting authority did not exclude any participant from the procurement procedure for the Public procurement.

1. **Identification of the Supplier with Whom the Contract Was Concluded, Including the Reasons for Its Selection and the Contract Price**

The Contracting authority did not conclude a contract with any supplier.

1. **Justification for the Use of a Negotiated Procedure with Prior Publication or a Competitive Dialogue**

The Contracting authority did not use a negotiated procedure without prior publication

1. **Justification for the Use of a Negotiated Procedure without Prior Publication**

The Contracting authority did not use a negotiated procedure without prior publication.

1. **Justification for the Use of the Simplified Regime**

The Contracting authority did not use the simplified regime.

1. **Justification for the Cancellation of the Procurement Procedure**

The procurement procedure for the Public procurement was cancelled pursuant to Section 127(2)(h) of the ZZVZ, as there was only one participant in the procurement procedure.

1. **Justification for the Use of Means of Communication Other than Electronic Means for the Submission of Tenders**

The Contracting authority permitted the submission of tenders exclusively by electronic means.

1. **List of Persons in Respect of Whom a Conflict of Interest Was Identified and the Measures Subsequently Adopted**

The Contracting authority did not identify any persons with a conflict of interest.

1. **Justification for Not Dividing the Above-Threshold Public procurement into Lots**

The Public procurement was not divided into lots because its subject matter constitutes a single integrated system/unit that cannot be technically divided without limiting certain functionalities of the

Page 3

equipment. Owing to the nature of the subject matter of the performance, the Public procurement could therefore not be divided into lots.

1. **Justification for Requiring Proof of Turnover in Accordance with Section 78(3) of the ZZVZ**

The Contracting authority did not require proof of turnover in accordance with Section 78(3) of the ZZVZ. In Olomouc

…………………………………………… doc. JUDr. Michael Kohajda, Ph.D. rector